Why are you voting for Obama?

Saturday, February 16, 2008

Why Huckabee Can't Drop Out

A funny graphic going around the Internet these days shows Senator John McCain and Governor Mike Huckabee in full debate mode. McCain says, "Since all of the moderates in the country have endorsed me, I think you should drop out of the race and let me fool the Democrats!" Huckabee replies, "Since all of the moderates in the country have endorsed you, I think conservatives should be able to vote for me."

This strikes at the heart of why Mike Huckabee seems to dig his heels in when operatives within McCain's campaign and the Commentocracy urge him to quit before voters in 20 other states have been heard. Huckabee clearly is not following any conventional political instincts in his decision to remain in the race until someone clinches the nomination. Instead, he's listening to the most vocal chorus of more than two million supporters who have yet to participate in the electoral process. Huckabee is the only means conservatives have of conveying a simple message to McCain: "If you want to be our nominee, earn it."

The political party bosses front loaded the nominating process to give moderates a better shot at bringing forth an early nominee from their ranks. Unfortunately, they didn't count on the presence of a strong and motivated conservative base this election cycle. Their hopes of repackaging Mitt Romney as a conservative fell flat -- none of his conservative views were realized before he opened his campaign headquarters. Romney is so prone to ideological fluidity that he originally endorsed Mike Huckabee, withdrew that endorsement so he could run, and then did a 180 kick-flip to grind his way into the McCain camp. Suddenly, McCain went from geriatric ultra-liberal to a national hero and man of substance. Such is the character of the people who occupy the highest rungs of the GOP ladder. While many conservatives were fooled into supporting Romney, thanks to an almost hysterical two-week rant from Talk Radio, a remnant of serious conservatives stood their ground, voting for Huckabee and for Fred Thompson. McCain's divide and conquer strategy proved more effective than Giuliani’s firewall in God's Waiting Room.

Even if the conservative remnant were foolish enough to fall for Romney's multiple personality disorder of a campaign, he didn't have a chance against McCain. Just before Romney dropped out, the math told the story: McCain at that point had 53% of delegates and everyone else combined had 47%. Pundits and historians will fiddle with facts for generations to come, but the bottom line is that the "Anybody but Romney" vote far outweighed the "Anybody but McCain" vote. The Establishment would have been happy with either man, since their objective is to have a moderate who can appeal to some Democrat constituency. They closed ranks behind the more liberal McCain as soon as he sowed traction. What better Republican to run against liberal Democrats than one who has supported them more often than his own party? If it was only about power and winning, this would be a slam dunk. Unfortunately, some of us still look for something intangible – like core convictions. Romney had none and McCain’s are fundamentally wrong for conservatives.

Huckabee, and to a lesser degree Fred Thompson, provided conservatives with an alternative "anti-Establishment" vehicle. The GOP Establishment and NeoLib conservatives had no way of anticipating that the conservative base had finally reached the tipping point of refusing to be the GOP's step 'n fetchers for yet another election cycle. The 2008 election cycle is proving to be a pivotal moment for traditional conservatives. Instead of staying home in droves as they did in 2006, conservatives may well bolt the party altogether if the rift is not healed soon. It cannot be healed by efforts to crush Huckabee's Quixotic insurgency. MEMO To McCain Camp: Huckabee's supporters aren't going to support you until the last delegate has voted at the convention. Even then, much rests in the person who will run with McCain. Without a real conservative on the ticket, all of the geotargeting in Huckabee's strong districts will not pursuade the political burn victims on the right.

Less than a month ago, GOP insiders were salivating over the possibility that a young and charismatic Democrat named Barack Obama would be crushed by the Clinton Machine in the most cynical and abusive way, putting a disillusioned African-American voting block up for grabs. The Perfect Storm of Bill Clinton's racial slurs and Obama's lack of gravitas did not come to fruition. Democrat Party bosses reined the former President in and many African-American leaders closed ranks behind Hillary -- for a few hours. In spite of his weakness as a potential leader of the free world, Obama's growing popularity is allowing him to ride a wave of feel-good 60's type Democratic politics -- possibly all the way to 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.

What it means.

The GOP needs their base back. Even if Hillary is the Democratic nominee, Al Gore and other party leaders are trying to make an amicable end to the Democratic Party's current nominating disaster. The Democratic nominee will be poised to wage a generational battle of their Young Liberal against the GOP's Old Moderate. Conservatives need not show up. McCain cannot be recast as a conservative with any more credibility than Romney was. Without the Get Out the Vote efforts of disenfranchised Social Conservatives, McCain cannot win. He would be a fool to pick Romney or any other moderate as his running mate. He may not be thinking of Huckabee with any warm fuzzy feelings right now, but he needs to make a credible overture to the new generation of Social Conservatives. Establishment "OnceCons" like Gary Bauer, Pat Robertson and Phyllis Schlafley have no credibility speaking to this constituency. Their endorsements of “any elephant”, including moderates, over the past twenty years has proven that their loyalty is with pragmatic politics and not movement conservatism.

Conventional wiseguys tell us this new Social Conservative movement is uniting around the impossible hope that Huckabee could emerge as a standard bearer in a brokered convention. They are short sighted and shallow in their analysis. What is happening is a united effort among SoCons to take their place at the table -- even if they have to scorch the tablecloth in the process. If conservatives are not given an opportunity to vote their conscience and the GOP loses in the Fall, the fault will not be their intransigence. It will be the end of their 40 year journey of discovery that people of principle can never throw in with people of power and expect to come out with a clear conscience. The last few primaries will be their final feeble attempt at conveying this message to the moderates who run the party. It can be a reunion song or a breakup song.

John McCain and his OnceCon apologists are calling the tune.

4 comments:

Sendy said...

Perfect evaluation of the problem. Another is that McCain's problem as a "switcher" is still a problem. If he switches his stand to appease the SoCons, we still don't think he can be trusted not to switch back once elected. I prefer a man of true integrity like Huckabee.

Danny Vice said...

I have a question for Conservatives who claim that there is something honorable about not voting for McCain, refuse to help out and vow to sit home on election day..

What is honorable about sitting on your butt at home, refusing to vote – allowing all branches of government to be swarmed by RABIDLY liberal opponents who have vowed to undo everything conservatives have fought to achieve over the past decade?

I hear endless whining and griping from Conservatives – while the extreme liberals, who are bent on reversing every conservative principal – out number us at the polls nearly two to one. Great work conservatives!

What is so conservative about beating down the only candidate who supports our troops, instead of the extreme liberals who insult them on a daily basis?

By punishing John McCain for not being conservative enough – you are really punishing all conservatives by making absolutely sure they will be governed by radical, rabid liberalism for the next 4 to 8 years.

By stomping your feet and refusing to help, you in turn assure them the laws of the land will have few conservatives in a position of power to stop a runaway liberal train.

If you must be dragged to the polls, then don’t bother complaining when our courts are swarmed by the liberals who will put judges in power. Liberals are outpacing us at the polls at a rate of two rabid liberals for every conservative who can hardly be bothered to show up. Why must conservatives always shoot themselves in the foot?

Please think twice before punishing the rest of us conservatives, who may not love McCain, but are smart enough to realize the living nightmare that will ensue, if things continue on the path they are going.

Please open your eyes and look at what will happen, should you decide to go on punishing all of us – by refusing to work with us to stop extreme liberalism from enveloping our entire government.

Danny Vice
http://thalunatic.blogspot.com

gladsong said...

All conservatives with deep convictions about abortion/life, marriage, limited government ++ must rise up and seize the day. In Mike Huckabee there has emerged a banner bearer who can gather all those who feel disenfranchised from the Republican party. Many of those have voted Republican alright, but not with all their heart. And not so few have stayed home, not willing to compromise their convictions.

Interestingly, lately I've seen some Obama-supporters switch to Mike Huckabee due to his clear and bold plans on tax reform and other issues. I believe that Huckabee - if he emerges as the Republican champion - will prevail in November regardless who the opponent will be. But for that to happen the conservatives must rise up to support him. His biggest battle is to win the nomination.

The internal battle within those who consider themselves conservatives is this: Do I vote from my core beliefs or do I take a pragmatic view of things which in reality is to beat with the drum of leaders of the Republican party? Now is the time to take a stand. It seems so obvious that in the next primaries a vote for McCain is an endorsment of the present Republican party beliefs, direction and strategy. A vote for Huckabee will be a vote for dramatic change in leadership in that same party.

So, people of Wisconsin, Texas and the rest of the not-yet-had-primary states: Be bold, send a message to the pundits, the media, the party elite that you want to have a say in the choosing of a presidential candidate. Protest against the devaluing of your vote.

And be a world changer. The next president, as all US presidents, will also impact the rest of the world for good or for bad. The future of the world is in the balance. Above all, this primary-battle must also be fought, and won, on bended knees. Pray hard.

Quiverdaddy said...

Danny Vice said, "What is honorable about sitting on your butt at home, refusing to vote – allowing all branches of government to be swarmed by RABIDLY liberal opponents who have vowed to undo everything conservatives have fought to achieve over the past decade?"

I think that's why so many SoCons are rallying behind Huckabee now. By making their statement before the convention, they are more likely to get a conservative VP for McCain. That might make him more pallatable to those who are saying now they will not support him in the fall.

The GOP Establishment has been trying for years to find a way to jettison the Social Conservatives from the party and McCain is their opportunity to do just that.

As far as your assumption that SoCons who don't support your candidate will allow a liberal government to undo all we've worked for over the past decade, consider their point of view:

McCain IS a liberal candidate who is somewhat pro-life. He has worked aggressively to undo our progress through McCain-Feingold, McCain-Kennedy, McCain-Lieberman (see a pattern here) and the Gang of 14 usurpers who sought to uphold the Democrat fillibuster of conservative judges.

There is a growing a perception on the part of many SoCons that it won't matter either way. Their voice is not heard, so you and your candidate will need to work a little harder to find another group to join your coalition.

McCain has indicated he wants a moderate running mate and he's floated a few repackaged liberals already.

What we're witnessing, I believe is a realignment of the GOP that will be disastrous for our country. As the political parties cease to have a cultural conscience, there will be no voice for those in the body politic who still do.

Some of the GOP establishment's canards don't work anymore. "If you don't elect a liberal Republican, a liberal Democrat might be elected -- this is our last chance to get another David Souter! Think what would happen if Obama won and we got another Ruth Bader Ginsberg!" It just doesn't play anymore. Yeah, that's the difference. As for your claim that SoCons have achieved anything at all in the past decade, we're talking table scraps -- and McCain was on the other side in most cases.

You may want to view the movie, "The Manchurian Candidate". It might be instructive.